ભારત ના પાંચ સ્થળો જ્યાં જવા માટે લેવી પડે છે ઇનર લાઈન પરમીટ

ભારત ના પાંચ સ્થળો જ્યાં જવા માટે લેવી પડે છે ઇનર લાઈન પરમીટ

લોકતલ લેક, મણિપુર

 

ભારતના ઉત્તર-પૂર્વમાં સૌથી મોટા સ્વચ્છ પાણીના લેક તરીકે ઓળખાતા લોકતલ લેકમાં ઘણી જગ્યાએ ભૂખંડના તુકડા તરતા દેખાય છે. આ ટુકડાઓમાં  પણ પાણી ભરાયેલું હોય છે. પાણી ભરેલા આ ટુકડાઓેને ફુમદી કહેવામાં આવે છે, જે માટી, ફૂલ-છોડ અને જૈવિક પદાર્થો મળીને કંઠોર સંરચનામાં બનેલા  હોય છે. પોતાના આ વિશિષ્ટતાને કારણે આ તળાવ લોકોને બહુ આકર્ષે છે. જો કે આ તળાવ જોવા માટે પણ દરેક પ્રવાસીએ ખાસ પરમિટ લેવું પડે છે.

આઈજોલ, મિજોરમ

 

મિજોરમની રાજધાની આઈજોલમાં ઘણાં સુંદર સ્થળો આવેલા છે. જેને જોવા માટે દેશ દુનિયાથી લોકો આવે છે. જેમાં મ્યુઝિયમ, હિલ સ્ટેશન, સ્થાનિક લોકો અને તેમની કળાનો સમાવેશ થાય છે. જો કે મિજોરમમાં પણ ઇનર લાઈન પરમિટ લાગુ હોવાથી લિમિટેડ ટાઈમ માટે ટૂરિસ્ટ અહીં પરમિશન લઈને  ફરવા જઇ શકે છે.

જીરો, અરુણાચલ પ્રદેશ

 

અરુણાચલ પ્રદેશમાં પણ ઇનર લાઈન પરમિટ લાગુ છે. તેથી જ અહીં જવા માટે પણ પરમિશન લેવી પડે છે. અહીં ઘણાં જોવાલાયક સ્થળો છે પણ એ  બધામાં સૌથી પોપ્યુલર જીરો વેલી છે. આ વેલીને વર્લ્ડ હેરિટેજ સાઈટમાં સ્થાન આપવામાં આવ્યું છે. ઉલ્લેખનીય વાત છે કે આ વેલી પાસે જ આપાતાની  ટ્રાઈબ સાથે જોડાયેલા લોકો રહે છે.

કોહિમા, નાગાલેન્ડ

 

પહાડના એક ટોચ પર વસેલું કોહિમા ભારતના ઉત્તર-પૂર્વી રાજ્ય નાગાલેન્ડની રાજધાની છે. આ અંગામી નાગા જનજાતિની ભૂમિ છે. આને એશિયાના  સ્વિત્ઝરલેન્ડ તરીકે પણ ઓળખવામાં આવે છે. જો કે આ જગ્યાએ જવા માટે ઇનર લાઈન પરમિટની જરૂર પડે છે.

ચાંગુ લેક, સિક્કિમ

 

ચાંગુ લેક સિક્કિમનું મુખ્ય ટૂરિસ્ટ ડેસ્ટિનેશન છે. શિયાળામાં તો આ તળાવનું પાણી જામી જાય છે. જો કે આ લેક જોવા માટે પણ તમારે ઇનર લાઈન પરમિટ લેવુ પડે છે.

ઇનર લાઈન પરમિટ એટલે શું?
ઇનર લાઈન પરમિટ ભારતનો અધિકૃત યાત્રા દસ્તાવેજ છે.  જે દેશ-વિદેશના ટૂરિસ્ટને પ્રોટેક્ટેડ એરિયામાં જવાનું પરમિટ આપે છે. આ પરમિટ ચોક્કસ સીમા અને કેટલાક લોકો માટે જ માન્ય હોય છે. મુખ્યત: આ પરમિટ હાલ ભારતમાં માત્ર ત્રણ રાજ્યો મિજોરમ, નાગાલેન્ડ અને અરુણઆચલ પ્રદેશમાં લાગુ છે. જો કે આ રાજ્યો સિવાય બીજા દેશોના બોર્ડર લાઈન પર પણ આવા પરમિટની જરૂર હોય છે.

HISTORY OF HARRAPA

HISTORY OF HARRAPA

Harappa is an archaeological in Punjab, Pakistan, about 24 km west of Sahiwal. The site takes its name from a modern village located near the former course of the Ravi River. The current village of Harappa is 6 km from the ancient site. Although modern Harappa has a legacy railway station from the period of the British Raj, it is today just a small crossroads town of population 15,000.

The site of the ancient city contains the ruins of a Bronze Age fortified city, which was part of the Cemetery H culture and the Indus Valley Civilization, centered in Sindh and the Punjab. The city is believed to have had as many as 23,500 residents and occupied about 150 hectares (370 acres) with clay sculptured houses at its greatest extent during the Mature Harappan phase (2600–1900 BC), which is considered large for its time. Per archaeological convention of naming a previously unknown civilization by its first excavated site, the Indus Valley Civilization is also called the Harappan Civilization.

The ancient city of Harappa was heavily damaged under British rule, when bricks from the ruins were used as track ballast in the construction of the Lahore-Multan Railway. In 2005, a controversial park scheme at the site was abandoned when builders unearthed many archaeological artifacts during the early stages of building work. A plea from the Pakistani archaeologist Ahmad Hasan Dani to the Ministry of Culture resulted in a restoration of the site.

The Indus Valley Civilization (also known as the Harappan culture) has its earliest roots in cultures such as that of Mehrgarh, approximately 6000 BCE. The two greatest cities, Mohenjo-Daro and Harappa, emerged circa 2600 BCE along the Indus River valley in Punjab and Sindh. The civilization, with a possible writing system, urban centers, and diversified social and economic system, was rediscovered in the 1920s after excavations at Mohenjo-Daro in Sindh near Larkana, and Harappa, in west Punjab south of Lahore. A number of other sites stretching from the Himalayan foothills in east Punjab, India in the north, to Gujarat in the south and east, and to Pakistani Baluchistan in the west have also been discovered and studied. Although the archaeological site at Harappa was damaged in 1857 when engineers constructing the Lahore-Multan railroad (as part of the Sind and Punjab Railway), used brick from the Harappa ruins for track ballast, an abundance of artifacts has nevertheless been found. The bricks discovered were made of red sand, clay, stones and were baked at very high temperature. As early as 1826 Harappa located in west Punjab attracted the attention of a British officer in India, gets credit for preliminary excavations in Harappa.

Indus Valley civilization was mainly an urban culture sustained by surplus agricultural production and commerce, the latter including trade with Sumer in southern Mesopotamia. Both Mohenjo-Daro and Harappa are generally characterized as having "differentiated living quarters, flat-roofed brick houses, and fortified administrative or religious centers."^[8] Although such similarities have given rise to arguments for the existence of a standardized system of urban layout and planning, the similarities are largely due to the presence of a semi-orthogonal type of civic layout, and a comparison of the layouts of Mohenjo-Daro and Harappa shows that they are in fact, arranged in a quite dissimilar fashion.

The chart weights and measures of the Indus Valley Civilization, on the other hand, were highly standardized, and conform to a set scale of gradations. Distinctive seals were used, among other applications, perhaps for identification of property and shipment of goods. Although copper and bronze were in use, iron was not yet employed. "Cotton was woven and dyed for clothing; wheat, rice, and a variety of vegetables and fruits were cultivated; and a number of animals, including the humped, were domesticated," as well as "fowl for fighting". Wheel-made pottery some of it adorned with animal and geometric motifs has been found in profusion at all the major Indus sites. A centralized administration for each city, though not the whole civilization, has been inferred from the revealed cultural uniformity; however, it remains uncertain whether authority lay with a commercial oligarchy. Harappans had many trade routes along the Indus River that went as far as the Persian Gulf, Mesopotamia, and Egypt. Some of the most valuable things traded were carnelian and lapis lazuli.

What is clear is that Harappan society was not entirely peaceful, with the human skeletal remains demonstrating some of the highest rates of injury (15.5%) found in South Asian prehistory. Pale pathological analysis demonstrated that leprosy and tuberculosis were present at Harappa, with the highest prevalence of both disease and trauma present in the skeletons from Area G (an ossuary located south-east of the city walls). Furthermore, rates of crania-facial trauma and infection increased through time, demonstrating that the civilization collapsed amid illness and injury. The bio archaeologists who examined the remains have suggested that the combined evidence for differences in mortuary treatment and epidemiology indicate that some individuals and communities at Harappa were excluded from access to basic resources like health and safety, a basic feature of hierarchical societies world-wide.

The excavators of the site have proposed the following chronology of Harappa's occupation:

1.   Ravi Aspect of the Hakra phase, c. 3300 – 2800 BC.

2.   Kot Dijian (Early Harappan) phase, c. 2800 – 2600 BC.

3.   Harappan Phase, c. 2600 – 1900 BC.

4.   Transitional Phase, c. 1900 – 1800 BC.

5.   Late Harappan Phase, c. 1800 – 1300 BC.

By far the most exquisite and obscure artifacts unearthed to date are the small, square steatite (soapstone) seals engraved with human or animal motifs. A large number of seals have been found at such sites as Mohenjo-Daro and Harappa. Many bear pictographic inscriptions generally thought to be a form of writing or script. Despite the efforts of philologists from all parts of the world, and despite the use of modern cryptographic analysis, the signs remain undeciphered. It is also unknown if they reflect proto-Dravidian or other non-Vedic language(s). The ascription of Indus Valley Civilization iconography and epigraphy to historically known cultures is extremely problematic, in part due to the rather tenuous archaeological evidence of such claims, as well as the projection of modern South Asian political concerns onto the archaeological record of the area. This is especially evident in the radically varying interpretations of Harappan material culture as seen from both Pakistan- and India-based scholars. In February 2006 a school teacher in the village of Sembian-Kandiyur in Tamil Nadu discovered a stone Celt (tool) with an inscription estimated to be up to 3,500 years old. Indian epigraphist Iravatham Mahadevanpostulated that the four signs were in the Indus script and called the find "the greatest archaeological discovery of a century in Tamil Nadu". Based on this evidence he goes on to suggest that the language used in the Indus Valley was of Dravidian origin. However, the absence of a Bronze Age in South India, contrasted with the knowledge of bronze making techniques in the Indus Valley cultures, calls into question the validity of this hypothesis.

Clay and stone tablets unearthed at Harappa, which were carbon dated 3300–3200 BCE., contain trident-shaped and plant-like markings. "It is a big question as to if we can call what we have found true writing, but we have found symbols that have similarities to what became Indus script" said Dr. Richard Meadow of Harvard University, Director of the Harappa Archeological Research Project. This primitive writing is placed slightly earlier than primitive writings of the Sumerians of Mesopotamia, dated c.3100 BCE. These markings have similarities to what later became Indus Script.